Effect of lesional differences in prolapsed leaflets on clinical outcomes in patients with mitral valve prolapse.

BACKGROUND Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is usually benign, although serious complications may occur. It remains unclear whether the region of prolapsed mitral leaflets might affect prognosis. The aim of this study was to investigate lesional differences of clinical courses of MVP. METHODS AND RESULTS We retrospectively investigated 128 MVP patients who had been followed up for for a mean of 56.4 months. They were classified into prolapse of the anterior mitral leaflet (AML, n = 59), posterior mitral leaflet (PML, n = 47), or both leaflets (AML & PML, n = 22). Echocardiographic and clinical data were examined from medical records. Average time to clinical events; MV surgery, new onset of atrial fibrillation (AF), echocardiographic evidence of new chordal rupture, and worsening of mitral regurgitation severity were all significantly shorter in PML prolapse than in those with AML or AML & PML prolapses. Increases in the left ventricular dimensions and estimated pulmonary arterial systolic pressures were significantly larger in PML prolapse, compared with AML or AML & PML prolapses. A subanalysis of PML prolapse revealed that new chordal rupture tended to be more frequent in middle scallop prolapse (48%) compared with lateral and medial scallops (18%). In contrast, new onset of AF tended to occur in lateral and medial scallop prolapses (44%) compared with middle scallop prolapse (20%). CONCLUSIONS PML prolapse patients had a poor outcome, compared with AML or AML & PML prolapse patients. Precise regional evaluation of the prolapsed leaflets may predict cardiac complications in MVP.